Reviews for Synology Image Assistant Extension
Synology Image Assistant Extension by Synology Inc.
Review by Firefox user 14836411
Rated 1 out of 5
by Firefox user 14836411, a year ago30 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by nikl, 17 days agoYes, of course I want to install a browser extension plus desktop app to support something that used to work out of the box. Terrible
- Rated 1 out of 5by das_ICH, 21 days agoUseless for linux since this needs a runing windows app in the background
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 18750883, 2 months agoWhy this extension has access to all websites data?! 2 starts instead of 1 because at least works but please adjust the permissions!
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17574817, 3 months agoThis move makes Synology Photos useless for me. Next NAS will be UGREEN with Immich in Docker. Thank you Synology for giving me the necessary shove I needed for this overdue decision.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 19647218, 5 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by yx, 7 months agoIt is a bad idea to let clients do works server supposed to do, the performance is very bad, Synology NAS is getting harder to use than before
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17126796, 9 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 19191558, 10 months ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 13848580, a year agoI assume that this feature should be added to the server and not to the browser. This extension should not have access to all websites. After using it for a few months, I rarely use the upload feature for these file formats. I prefer to uninstall it, as the pros and cons are too negative.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Matthew Wade, a year agoCommon image formats like HEIC should be supported natively in Synology Photos. This is pushing me towards Open Source alternatives
- Rated 1 out of 5by natxocc, a year agoSoy usuario de 6 equipos Synology. Ahora mis equipos han perdido el valor ya que las fotografías, uno de mis principales motivos, no sirven para nada con esta tontería que han hecho. Wallapop para ir vendiendo mis Synology's y por suerte en el mercado ahora exiten opciones muy interesantes para sustituirlo, menor precio, mayor libertad y muy completas.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 15409872, a year agoC'mon, Synology! Add the codecs back. This is ridiculous.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18833945, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by wnagrodzki, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by wolfangaukang, a year agoSo cool they decided to do this to us and not even give support to Linux users for the desktop app. Seriously considering another option after this.
- Rated 1 out of 5by SireMarcus, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by paradeiser, a year agoThats a deal-breaker. Ripping vital functions from DSM and forcing end-users (not just admins) to install extra software (Browser plug-in PLUS desktop software!) is a real breach of trust!
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18701088, a year agoEine Frechheit, was sich Synology mit dem Update auf 7.2.2 geleistet hat. Funktionen auf dem Server wegnehmen und dann nur halbherzig auf die Clients verlagen. Linux User bleiben jedenfalls hier außen vor
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 14053296, a year agoThey decided to make the user experience worse. If I want to share HEIC files with others through Synology Photos I have to make them go trhough stupid hoops to install things they don't want. This has singlehandledly made me decide to move away from Synology for my next NAS.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 16005419, a year agoSynolgoy has removed basic functionality with this decison and made their NAS non-competitive with other brands. When it's time for a new NAS, I won't be procuring Synology. Makes you wonder who is making decisions like this. Really unfortunate.